Articles

AGM Field Trips 2010

Les McCracken

HGA newsletter July 2010

Field trips were held in South Canterbury in association with the AGM. On Saturday, about 50 people attended a field-day at Linda and Les McCracken’s orchard at Ashburton where the focus was on harvesting tools. This included a demonstration of the Italian harvester imported by Les and Linda earlier this year, as well as a sweeper designed and manufactured in Oamaru for Tim and Judith Medlicott.
The McCrackens imported the Super Jolly 2800 after seeing it while at the Hazelnut Congress in Italy in 2008. The complete unit cost approximately $29000 including freight. It uses mechanical pickup, rather than suction, to avoid blockages, and screens out soil and trash. A key advantage for the McCrackens is that the unit can be operated by one person.

Les reported that the machine coped well with loose surface material, and sorted this from the crop very effectively – very little rubbish was collected with the nuts. The harvester achieved about 2.8 hours per hectare, and Les believes this can be further improved with some minor modifications to block layout.

The machine has an operating width of 2.8 m (harvester 1.8 m, side sweeper 1 m) and is front-mounted onto a tractor with a minimum PTO requirement of 12.5 kW. The manufacturer also offers smaller and less sophisticated units. For more details, see the full report on the website.

Les McCracken’s Super Jolly 2800 harvester

Field trips on Sunday included visits to the properties of Terry and Christine Hutton, and Murray and Linda Cannon.

AGM report 2010

By Sarah Shore

HGA newsletter July 2010

The 2010 Annual General Meeting of the Hazelnut Growers’ Association was held on 3 June 2010 at Ashburton and attended by about 60 members.

In addition to the President’s Report (see above), Murray Redpath delivered a presentation on issues facing growers and the industry as a whole. This sparked an extensive discussion on the role of HGA and the future of the organisation and the industry. Key questions were:

• What is the role of HGANZ in developing the local industry, and how does that complement the activities of commercial enterprises?

• How can we make hazelnuts a viable crop for existing and potential new growers – focusing on a domestic or export market? If we target exports, which are our likely markets? (Bearing in mind that US growers now export most of their crop to Asia, particularly Hong Kong and Viet Nam.)

• What varieties would best support the selected growth strategy? (At present, new plantings are overwhelmingly Whiteheart, but US exports are mainly in-shell.)

Chairman’s report 2010

By Murray Redpath

Delivered to the HGA AGM, 3 June 2010

In late October I attended the annual conference of the Hazelnut Growers of Australia and gave a talk on “The Development of the NZ Hazelnut Industry”. I spent a few days before the conference staying with Basil and Jean Baldwin in central New South Wales. Basil and Jean visited Canterbury in 2006 and spoke at the HGANZ AGM. Basil is semi-retired but still does some work at the Charles Sturt University in Orange. One of his recently completed projects was a guide to the identification of hazelnut varieties grown in Australia.

The last year has been busy for the Hazelnut Growers Association of NZ, with an active research programme, organizing a visit by an overseas hazel adviser, and maintaining the flow of information via the website and newsletters. Your committee has continued to hold meetings via email whenever a meeting has been required. These seem to work well and are being refined as we develop the system. If detailed discussions are needed, then telephone conference calls are now very competitively priced.

My thanks to all the committee members. Jenny has kept our meetings well recorded and Sarah has provided you all with interesting informative newsletters, as well as trying to keep the Growers Manual on track. Thanks to you all for your dedication to growing this organization.

Some committee members have chosen not to stand for reappointment this year. Alan wishes to step down as treasurer, having done an excellent job in this position since the formation of HGANZ. Thank you for your contribution, Alan, and the many field days and Annual General Meeting weekends that you have organized. Willy wishes to stand down from the committee but is willing to stay on as webmaster, an offer we will accept given his skills in this area. Linda. Thanks for your help and especially the copies of the Acta Hort. hazel proceedings. I am wading my way through them and will summarize the most relevant papers for the newsletter. Blake. Thanks for your help and offer to assist with any orchard trials. David Null has ended a long association with the HGANZ committee. Thank you, David, for your dedication over the last eight years.

We need a certain number of members on the committee to carry out the day to day administration, but I hope that we can call on other members with special areas of expertise to help with specific tasks. For example, if we continue to apply for research grants, then a separate research subcommittee would be useful to administer all projects rather than having separate committees formed for each application.

Indications are that the last harvest was the largest ever for most growers. Time will tell whether this increased yield is due largely to increased maturity of the orchards or to good growing season. However, the increased crop of the last two years has certainly highlighted the need to look at efficient harvesting systems and how to market an increasing crop.

It is difficult for small industries to access significant research funding and the the recent budget does not seem to assist us at all. It was pleasing to see that the MAF Sustainable Farming Fund has received increased funding after last year’s cuts. I will briefly summarize our research progress here and we can discuss the projects in more detail after the AGM. The seven pollination workshops held last winter as part of the Sustainable Farming Fund project on hazel pollination were well attended by 155 HGANZ and NZTCA members, plus members of the general public. Thanks to all those members who hosted or helped run the workshops. This project continues, with the second part on identifying hazel varieties nearly complete. The final report is due at the end of June.

We have continued to move our research programme forward by successfully applying for a further grant from the MAF Sustainable Farming Fund. This 3 year project, titled “Establishing polliniser recommendations and realistic yield data for NZ hazelnut orchards” will collect and analyze data on flowering times and yields. The aim is to find out what is actually happening out in your orchards. This will help identify possible factors influencing the performance of your orchards to allow us to provide better advice. It will also help to identify areas that require more research. Success in this project is very dependent on growers willingness to collect and contribute flowering and yield information.

The HGANZ assisted to bring Professor Jeff Olsen to New Zealand to attend the 2010 NZ Tree Crops Association conference. A meeting for HGANZ members was arranged for Easter Monday at the BHU facility at Lincoln. This was well attended by 33 members despite the short notice given. I hope that members benefited from the visit. Professor Olsen has given permission to use the material contained in his presentations, with suitable acknowledgement. I would welcome any feedback on this visit to help improve the benefits of future visits by overseas speakers.

Professor Olsen’s airfares and conference costs were sponsored by Agmardt, the Wellington branch of NZTCA, and HGANZ. The pre-and post – conference trips were sponsored by Wairata Forest Farm. Thanks to Malcolm and Sarah Shore, Sjef and Sonja Lamers, Malcolm and Jenny Horwell, Les and Linda McCracken, and Toni Elliot for their hospitality during these trips. Also, thanks to all the growers who allowed us to visit their orchards for their wonderful hospitality.

I attended the annual conference of the Hazelnut Growers of Australia in late October last year, giving a presentation on “The development of the NZ hazelnut Industry”. I was able to visit some of the research sites and talk with Basil Baldwin and Lester Snare who have carried out most of the hazel research in Australia. Their industry is much the same size as ours but they are better resourced and able to access reasonable funding for research. They can also leverage off the work carried out by the other larger Australian nut industries. Australia is a large and wealthy market but it is also a potential competitor with plans for large plantings in Tasmania.

It is encouraging to see the rise in membership over the last two years. Our membership subscription is modest compared to other similar organizations and the increased membership allows increased options when trying to access funding for projects. We do need to consider the changes occurring in the industry and how best to respond to them. When the HGANZ was formed in 2002, most of its members were in Canterbury. Our members are now spread throughout the South Island. How do we provide the service that our members want? What services do they want? What is the role of the HGANZ within the NZ hazelnut industry? Should we be defining our role, our goals, and drawing up a strategic plan to reach those goals?

Let us consider those questions after the AGM.

The NZ hazelnut industry. Where to from here?

By Murray Redpath

HGA newsletter October 2010.
Originally presented at HGANZ AGM, 2010

NZ hazel industry 2010:

NZ has over 430 hectares planted, most since 2000. Almost 100% of this area is planted in Whiteheart plus pollinisers so we have an industry dependent on successfully growing and marketing Whiteheart.

There has been a change in the orchard size since 2000 – from mainly orchards of 200-1000 trees to mainly orchards of over 1000 trees (see graphs below).
Fig. 1: Number of hazel trees per grower, SNGA hazelnut seminar 1996 (McNeil, 1996)
Percentage of attendees
60 50 40 30 20 10 0

<200 200-399 400-999 1000->2000 1999
Orchard tree number

Processing:

The Hazelnut Company is the largest hazelnut processor with a large factory in Canterbury; owned by about 100 grower shareholders.

There are five or six smaller processors with varying levels of sophistication. All sell into the NZ market. One small processor has a small export market.

Lessons from the past:

The NZ hazelnut industry has been developing for at least 30 years. Early research indicated the possibility of economical yields.

Example: Yields from the Gum Block, DSIR Research Orchard, Appleby, Nelson for the “Barcelona”* variety (multi-stemmed bush planted 1953) averaged over the years 1970 to 1975 = 10.3 kg/tree/year.

At 400 trees/ha. (5×5 spacing) = over 4 tonnes/ha/year.

*Note: the tree tested as “Barcelona” was renamed “Appleby” after Prof. Maxine Thompson established that it was not the true Barcelona during a visit in 1981. It appears to be identical to the Spanish cultivar Negret.

Appleby was the main variety planted in the early orchards. Crops well, kernels blanch well.

What happened to these early hazel orchards? A typical example is one in Maraekakaho, Hawke’s Bay.

Planted in 1984 at a 4 x 2 metre spacing. Mostly Appleby, later plantings included Whiteheart, Barcelona, Ennis, and Butler. 1989 photos show excellent yields 5 years after planting. The owner used a local hazelnut cracker copied from an American design to crack and sell the crop, successfully tested the sorting of kernel from shell at local seed dressing facilities, and tried vacuum packing nuts at local meat processing facilities.

The property was sold in 1990 just as the trees were starting to crop well. The new owner had no interest in hazels and did nothing to the trees. By 2000 the trees were over 5 metres high, a “forest” with a dense canopy, and the trees were riddled with big bud mite and lemon tree borer. Often the main tree had died and been replaced by vigorous suckers.

The property sold again in 2000, the new owner was told that hazels were of no use and should be pulled out. A chance visit revealed that he was interested in cropping the hazels if they could be rehabilitated. The orchard was trimmed to about 1.5 metres high and 1.5 m wide. Further trimming of excess suckers and branches occurred over the following 2 years.

The trees put on over a metre of healthy growth in the first year and the orchard was back to having a vigorous productive canopy carrying a heavy crop in 2004 when……..
The orchard was sold again (to an absentee landowner).

When last visited it was being leased by an organic grower who was using the hazel orchard to run free range hens. At least the orchard is still there – most of the ones that I visited in the 1980’s were pulled out in the 1990’s.

It is difficult to grow an industry and sustain processing plants and supply to markets when orchards disappear just as they are starting to produce well. At present I am hearing rumours of some growers talking about pulling their trees out – are we going to see history repeat itself?

Why do we all grow Whiteheart?

Whiteheart was selected from a group of old varieties and seedling selections by Prof Maxine Thompson during her 1981 visit and became widely recommended after it performed well in the Lincoln hazelnut trial. It has been promoted because it is seen as offering a quality advantage (a round clean kernel that blanches 100%) over Turkish or Italian kernel varieties.

It does have some problems such as vigorous suckering, late flowering, being susceptible to big bud mite and bacterial blight, and it does not yield well in many orchards.

Research Projects

MAF Sustainable Farming Fund L08-088:

Helping growers to record flowering information and write a web-based guide to hazel varieties. Due for completion in July 2010.

MAF Sustainable Farming Fund L10-148:

A 3 year project building on the last project by collecting and analysing flowering and yield data from growers. The aim is to identify possible causes of poor performance in some orchards (pollination problems, location, frost damage, variety selection?).

Others – Agmardt?

An application may be made for funding from Agmardt for a literature search and analysis into the potential for hazel growing as an economical alternative land use in water or environmentally sensitive areas.

Lessons from the Jeff Olsen road trip.

Prof. Olsen considered that the growth rate and yields of many of the Whiteheart orchards in Canterbury were much lower than Oregon orchards of a similar age.
We visited an interesting 11 year old orchard on the down lands west of Oamaru. Planted mainly in seedlings, it had 2 rows of Whiteheart that were yielding very well on heavy soils with irregular irrigation. This orchard showed the necessity for shelter – the Whiteheart were in the lee of the slope and well sheltered. Trees on the windward slope were struggling.

Prof. Olsen felt that the orchards in Nelson and Marlborough were more similar in growth to Oregon hazel orchards. He commented that the climate had a similar feel to it.

Site selection:

Prof. Olsen felt that more consideration needs to be given to selecting the correct variety for each site. Whiteheart is a low vigour variety and should only be grown on the best sites. On more difficult sites, a vigorous variety should be considered where the vigour will compensate for the slower growth rates.
Some interesting statistics from Prof. Olsen’s presentations at the April meeting:
• About 75% of the Oregon crop is sold in the shell.

• About 60% of the crop is exported.

Southwest Pacific In-shell Export Totals (Tons) August 2009 report

• Australia = 11.02

• China = 631.06

• Hong Kong = 13820.22

• Vietnam = 4282.79

• New Zealand = 1.5

• Total Tons = 18776.59

• This represents 85% of the total US Exports, up from 71% in 2007.

Costs of establishment for Oregon orchards: the break even point, when returns cover annual cash costs, is year 7 at standard densities (6 metre by 6 metre) and year 4 for double density orchards.

All previous cash costs of establishment are paid back by year 11 in standard density and year 9 for double density.

South east injury”:

Prof. Olsen recognized the damage to young trees in some orchards (Shore’s; McCracken’s) as damage by bacterial blight (Xanthamonas). It is common in Oregon on varieties susceptible to blight. It is caused when blight bacteria enter through bark damaged by rapid thawing on the sunny side of the trunks after severe winter frosts. In Oregon this is on the southeast side of the plant. This is the reason why they recommend painting the trunks over the first year.

Grafting onto existing trees to establish new varieties.

Oregon State University has successfully grafted new varieties onto existing trees in the orchard. Both top working trees and grafting onto suckers worked, grafting onto suckers was more successful (grafts at ground level were more sheltered than those in the canopy).

For grafting onto suckers, the tree was chopped down during the summer before grafting and a few suckers allowed to grow. Scion wood was collected in winter. Grafting took place in summer using a standard whip and tongue graft. It was critical to have daytime temperatures consistently above 20° C and to have high light levels around the tree to be grafted.

New varieties:

By “new varieties” I am referring to varieties that are already in NZ (such as Ennis) as well as imported varieties and new selections. There is renewed interest in varieties other than Whiteheart. Lansing and Ennis, two varieties grown for the in-shell market, are two varieties that are being planted. They are known to crop heavily and give good quality nuts in some locations (eg Marlborough) but we need more information about their performance in all growing areas before recommending large plantings. In Australia, Ennis often had a lot of shriveled kernels (Baldwin, 2007) and my experience supports this.

New Zealand has a useful number of the main varieties used internationally (eg Barcelona, Ennis, Tonda Romana, and Tonda di Giffoni) and perhaps we should examine their performance in various growing areas.

I have imported several new varieties from the Oregon State University programme and these are now out of quarantine. The main commercial variety is Jefferson. This has large nuts similar in size to Barcelona nuts but with fewer nut defects. It is a smaller tree and very productive. Jefferson flowers late and Eta and Theta were selected to pollinate it. It is susceptible to bacterial blight (similar level to Barcelona) so it may not be suited to harsher sites where blight has been a problem in Whiteheart.

The other 4 varieties imported are late pollinisers that are compatible with Whiteheart. In Oregon, Epsilon, Zeta, and Eta all drop pollen about a week after Merveille de Bollwiller and Theta about 2 weeks after M. de Bollwiller. They all have nuts about the same size as Whiteheart with kernels suited to the kernel market. Epsilon does not blanch but the other 3 varieties all blanch well (80-90% pellicle removal). Epsilon was imported because it is very resistant to big bud mites and may be useful where BBM is a problem.

I have used Merveille de Bollwiller as a standard reference and graphed the expected pollen release times below using data from Oregon and Tim Medlicott’s orchard near Dunedin. Theta may be a useful replacement for Alexandra in Whiteheart orchards.

We now have a wide range of hazel selections that drop pollen over August. There are selections from old Canterbury plantings and my breeding programme that cover this period and have kernels that blanch well. These may be useful as future pollinisers but we have not yet tested them for compatibility with Whiteheart whereas we know that the imported varieties are compatible.

The NZ hazelnut industry: At a crossroads?

We now seem to have a crop that is approaching the size of the local NZ market and we know that we will exceed the present NZ market for hazelnuts if all planted trees yield to expectations.

Do we want to keep planting and growing our crop?

Can we expand the local market or should we be looking at exports?
If we export, where are our markets likely to be and what varieties do we need for those markets?

Nut storage

HGA recently received enquiries on best practice for storing hazelnuts. Bryan Thomas offered the following advice.

By Bryan Thomas

HGA newsletter October 2010

There can be no doubt that hazelnuts will keep best in-shell provided that the moisture level is reasonably low (4-5%) and the temperature is moderate. Once out of the shell there is potential for contamination from handling, from containers and from airborne material, any of which can initiate deterioration. Such deterioration will proceed more rapidly at higher temperatures and in the presence of moisture.

If un-contaminated, the proteins and oils in the kernel will break down only slowly provided the temperature is low. Therefore the key is to ensure nuts are correctly dried, crack them in a clean environment, using clean utensils and use clean moisture-proof containers, and store at low temperatures (eg fridge). It is also worthwhile washing nuts prior to cracking if there is contamination on the outside of the shells that may get onto the kernel.

A light roasting prior to storage will de­activate fungal or bacterial contamination, BUT it also initiates the deterioration of the oils which, once started, does not stop even at low temperatures, so roasting prior to long term storage is not advised. For the same reason, do not let the nuts get excessively hot prior to cracking.

It is unlikely that anyone would wish to store kernel for longer than one year, and if the above points are followed then there should be no storage losses over that time. While they will still be acceptable after 12 months, many people will detect a change in flavour over that period. Where possible, freshly cracked is better.

Flowering and pollination

By Murray Redpath

HGA newsletter September 2011

The warm autumn experienced this year has highlighted the importance of current research into flowering and pollination behaviour of different cultivars at different locations around the country.

  • In South Canterbury (Geraldine), Lansing was in flower in mid-July but of the others only Butler had any flowers. Merveille, Alex and Whiteheart were shedding pollen from early July at least. By late August, there was still some flower on Butler, Ennis and MT18/114 but Lansing flowering was over. Merveille pollen was finished but Alexandra and Butler were still shedding.
  • In North Canterbury, Alexandra had an unusually long lead-in to pollen shed and peak dates seem about 2 weeks earlier than last year; MdB peaked 2 weeks later than Alex and had more prolonged shedding than previous years. Whiteheart flowering is later than previous years and looks likely to miss most of the pollen altogether.

Information on flowering and pollination in your orchard is vital to building up a complete picture of the behaviour of different cultivars throughout the country.
Flowering will be over soon so please email the results through as soon as possible so details can be analysed before Dr Grau’s visit.

Email: wairataforestfarm@farmside.co.nz
Submit online via http://www.hazelnut­growers.org.nz.
Post: Bag 1070, Opotiki 3162

A recording sheet and information about how to record your flowering information are available in the members’-only section of http://www.hazelnut-growers.org.nz.